SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer who wrote (106071)4/16/2000 9:53:00 AM
From: Scumbria  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574491
 
Elmer,

because they lied to their shareholders claiming "the yield problems are behind us" when a careful analysis proves they knew full well that they still had very serious yield problems at the time they lied and those problems continued for quite some time afterwards.

You are referring to Intel aren't you?

Scumbria



To: Elmer who wrote (106071)4/16/2000 9:56:00 PM
From: tejek  Respond to of 1574491
 
Whatever it is you're smoking you should drop it while you still have a few braincells left. AMD faced a sea of lawsuits because they lied to their shareholders claiming "the yield problems are behind us" when a careful analysis proves they knew full well that they still had very serious yield problems at the time they lied and those problems continued for quite some time afterwards.

EP,

Apparently Intel has done the very same thing; it assured customers and shareholders the cumine shortage problem would be over by March.....now it looks like June or July.

Now why are Intel shareholders not suing? Because Intel has the advantage of being able to sale sell ANCR shares in order to make its quarters.

I'll give Intel pts for having cash and investment reserves but otherwise their current performance is certainly no better than AMD's last year and probably worse since they have more $ to throw at a problem.

ted