SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Semi-Equips - Buy when BLOOD is running in the streets! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: studdog who wrote (8344)4/16/2000 1:55:00 PM
From: geoffrey Wren  Respond to of 10921
 
Interesting report I read in WSJ on investing theory (in Friday's paper, story on NASDAQ). Some academics set up a program to simulate the market,and then had 1/2 of participants invest based on fundamentals, and 1/2 on technicals (momentum, basically). Then the participants had to readjust their approach periodically based on results. If the period of readjustment was long, then fundamental approach won out; if short, then technical approach won out.

It is consistent with the market now. Seems to me though that there should be a fundamentalist approach to break through the pattern (like in a poker game, you see two players are playing in cahoots [one player with a so-so hand raising the player with the good hand to build the pot], you fold until you get the very good hand, and let them build the pot for you). The way I think would be look for stocks oversold by the momentum people, and when you own a stock that the momentum people have moved into, sell it, maybe buying back when the mo-mo people have moved on.

Still leaves the problem of timing the bottom or top, though. I think I'll put in some orders on several beat-down stocks about 10% below Friday's closing price.



To: studdog who wrote (8344)4/16/2000 5:51:00 PM
From: Jerome  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 10921
 
Opinions vary on the matter of cheap stocks in Semi-land.

Some worth a second look besides the ones you mentioned are:
LRCX, NVLS, AMAT, SVGI, SFAM.

Probably all will do well, but as to who will be the absolute percentage winner??????

Good Luck This week...Jerome



To: studdog who wrote (8344)4/16/2000 7:20:00 PM
From: John Cuthbertson  Respond to of 10921
 
Karl,

I would agree that the stocks on your list look like they have been knocked down to good prices, but some of them (e.g. Cohu) may be so thinly followed that they won't recover as quickly as some of the larger, more widely followed companies. A couple I think are good candidates here are Lam Research and Cymer.

==John C.