SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Gorilla and King Portfolio Candidates -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Uncle Frank who wrote (22863)4/16/2000 9:45:00 PM
From: porkbay  Respond to of 54805
 
Re:ltb&h
I don't for a minute think that GE or other non-tech stocks are targeted by the rtfm. My point is that the authors' approach is to identify ltb&h stocks which, incidently, is the Warren Buffett approach as well, even though he had a bad year for himself in 1999. He probably feels a little better these days about his decidedly non-tech investments.

I also think that a touch of paranoia is okay and any complacency (even with gorillas)a dangerous thing. About 25 years ago we had the Nifty Fifty (the one-decision stocks) whose numbers no doubt included Xerox, Polaroid and Avon.

History is a great teacher if we pay attention.

Porkboy



To: Uncle Frank who wrote (22863)4/16/2000 10:09:00 PM
From: alankeister  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 54805
 
re:what is GE

Porkbay: All are essentially ltb&h stocks and that is the essence of the Gorilla Game.
UF: ...The only type of stock the fm recommends for ltb&h is the Gorilla.


I just finished "One up on Wall Street", by Peter Lynch so this topic is fresh in my mind. He said he trades the "Stalwarts" such as GE, Coke, and P&G more frequently than any other type of stock. His reasoning is you won't get a ten bagger so when the P/E goes above the normal range and the stock price gets above the earnings line you should think about selling and look for a good buy in the same group.

This strategy hadn't occurred to me but it makes perfect sense. These companies generally have a long history of predictable growth. Large upswings in the stock are probably not caused by some new killer product because any single product has a small effect on the bottom line.

- Alan