Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (3974)	4/17/2000 1:20:00 PM
From: Wolff	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6847

Lemon, your continued driveling diatribe remains a warm compost of self-indulgent speeches to yourself. You manipulative rewriting of my words is a disappointment and discredit to you. May you perceive your words to be of wisdom, so that your bloated ego remains fooled. I find you to be a dishonest commentator on technology with an abundance of obvious word traps and linguistic methods of deceit. What I post is clear, while your recanting of my text is often a manglement of what you know is to be true. I see no purpose to in attempting to redress you false representations. It is clear by you statement, of "having fun" the facts and realistic apprasials are not paramount to your efforts. I am unimpressed by you technical evaluations on XYBR and in general your ignorance of technology trends. You foolhardy statement on XYBR CORE patent are particularly choice, as you know a docking station is specifically omitted from what XYBR has patented. As you are aware to make the CORE unique, XYBR had to write it such that the core will not function unless within an "Enclosure". If the module functions without an "enclosure" it is not covered by the Patent. A logical outgrowth of the docking station is not protected by the XYBR patent. Said another way: a CORE that functions without an Enclosure is not Patent protected, by my reading of the patent. Again, I do not think you are a poster who has truth as an intrinsic element of their writings, nor do I think you intellectually honest, and I am generally unimpressed with you simplistic view of what future technologies may bring. Remember that the stock that you have been hyping has fallen consistently since March 2nd. Enjoy yourself, and often. Wolff

To: Scott C. Lemon who wrote (3974)	4/17/2000 5:55:00 PM
From: Stan V.	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 6847

Scott, I just read this guys last message to you. I am glad that it isn't my imagination. He does have trouble with English and then suddenly he doesn't. Someone obviously helps him or he looks up phrases he has seen used before. It is very amusing to see him disprove and discredit himself without assistance from anyone. It is also curious that none of his other basher friends ever respond to him. Anyway, keep the real info coming and remember we are out here listening to you and we understand the technical aspects of your discussion and the future benefits as investors and users. Thank you. Stan