SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: mishedlo who wrote (40184)4/18/2000 12:47:00 AM
From: Ali Chen  Respond to of 93625
 
<Can you tell me why you expect Intel to drop support of Rambus? ... Do you have any clue as to what the Gorilla Game is about? >
Simple: no one, even Gorillas, can disobey the laws of
physics. Resistance is usually very costly.

<I do not give a rat's ass as to whether or not DDRAM is better than RDRAM.>
It is simply cheaper.

<I really do not give a S**T if AMD and VIA want DDRAM to be the standard.>
Nobody wants or dis-wants anything. The industry
naturally goes towards local and global minimums.

<What are their market shares compared to Intel's.>
I think Intel's share will shrink due to poor
packaging engineering.

<Personally from what I have read RDRAM is a better choice.>
You probably have read wrong articles, most likely
from Rambus marketing.

<There [their?] current chpsets do not support SDRAM very well.> ... and cause a lot of troubles.

<Where is all the DDRAM product anyway? Who has the lead?>
I don't know, but even with normally engineered
system with 133MHz Front-Side Bus (old i440BX) the
PCs with PC133 memory have better performance than
with Rambus..

<What is the value chain for DDRAM>
The value is 150-200 million od PC per year,
times about 32-36 chips per unit.

<what is the value chain for Rambus>
PS-II and maybe some video cards, with 2-4 chips
per unit. Kodak cameras probably will be fine
with flash memory...

- Ali Screwdriver.