Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Amy J who wrote (106470)	4/18/2000 1:12:00 AM
From: Scumbria	Respond to of 1574340

Amy, what could explain Paul's temporary absence more than anything else could be a very large tax bill due to large INTC gains last year. I wonder if Paul made more from INTC, AMD or NSM this past year. He claims to have taken a 400%+ ride on both of those since last summer. Scumbria

To: Amy J who wrote (106470)	4/18/2000 1:20:00 AM
From: Mani1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1574340

Amy re <<what could explain Paul's temporary absence more than anything else could be a very large tax bill due to large INTC gains last year. >> No Paul never sells INTC, or at least so he claims. I think Paul's absence has more to do with how wrong he has been with regard to AMD. Paul's took a lot of joy in watching people lose money on AMD and loved taunting them for it. He openly has admitted to this. Now that AMD is making the folks on this thread money, he can't bear to see people being happy. How dare are people making money from investing against the competitor of all mighty Intel. I honestly believe this! I also honestly believe that Paul has a serious psychiatric/personality problem best handled by a professional. Mani

To: Amy J who wrote (106470)	4/18/2000 1:36:00 AM
From: 5dave22	Respond to of 1574340

Amy <Paul and gains> Oh man! I guess this thread will be EMPTY the first two weeks of April in 2001! Dave

To: Amy J who wrote (106470)	4/18/2000 5:26:00 AM
From: Bill Jackson	Respond to of 1574340

Amy, He could have been one of those oh so clever people who shorted AMD a while back. Bill

To: Amy J who wrote (106470)	4/18/2000 7:10:00 AM
From: DRBES	Respond to of 1574340

re: "what could explain pauL's temporary absence?" pauL is not absent, he is lurking and looking for any miss que on our part. I can smell him. That stench pervades any thread on which he hides; and, yes, it is much too fresh to be explained by a mere after odor. Regards, DARBES