SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Pink Minion who wrote (34883)4/18/2000 11:10:00 AM
From: Tony Viola  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
MH, >I'll be looking at 2003 for a top.


Do you have any particular reasons? I'd be interested, if you want to lay them down.

Tony



To: Pink Minion who wrote (34883)4/18/2000 12:18:00 PM
From: dellman  Respond to of 70976
 
I tend to agree with you. Does everyone remember Brett Hodess with NationsBank Montgomery Securities? He correctly called the upswing in demand for semicon equip manufacturers in 1998. I have been trying to find information on what his view of the cycle has been lately. He said once lead times in orders start to shorten and plant utilization starts to drop, that is the time to sell. He says most analysts will at first rationalize these first declines as a healthy cooling of an overheated market, but he thinks it will actually be the beginning of overcapacity. That is why I think you are right with your 2003 prediction, because I find it hard to believe that the new capacity will not result in overcapacity before 2006.



To: Pink Minion who wrote (34883)4/19/2000 12:21:00 PM
From: Dr. Mitchell R. White  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 70976
 
I saw charts at AMAT when I worked there (1996) that showed AMAT to be $10-12 Billion by 1999. And that was before they "diversified" to cover nearly every type of fab tool! I didn't believe it then, but I still bought AMAT stock. Without such hype, AMAT was a good buy then.

Mitch