To: JanyBlueEyes  who wrote (5668 ) 4/27/2000 12:19:00 PM From: JanyBlueEyes  Read Replies (2)  | Respond to    
NEWS - DISMISSAL OF LAWSUITCourt Dismisses Class Action Lawsuit Against Chromatics plaintiffs have either not sufficiently specified the reasons that the statements were misleading , thereby failing to satisfy Rule9(b) and the PSLRA(Private Securities Litigation Reform Act)'s heightened pleading standard, or failed to specify a reason that would be actionable  under Section 10(b)."the court said, "(E)ach of the allegedly false statements ... is a factual statement whose truth is not in question .  None of the statements were statements of optimism or even statements about promises regarding the future.  They were factual statements about past events  which included no promises as to the future and as such, plaintiffs have not adequately explained the basis on which the statements were false and misleading when made."