Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : InfoSpace (INSP): Where GNET went! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: levy who wrote (18526)	4/18/2000 11:38:00 AM
From: tahoe_bound	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 28311

Right, Levy And they will be even less inclined to cover if they are publicly embarrased along with not receiving any fees or underwriting business. The longer it goes without coverage the more detrimental it is from a risk standpoint. You just don't want to have the stock lag for long periods of time making it more difficult to complete BIG acquisition deals, not just small companies near Chapter 11, when faced with a possibility albeit small that the entire market landscape could be changed post election with an out of control hostile Fed and a subsequent weakened dollar. The longer it goes the harder it makes it for everyone, especially us little supporters. With very high historical p/e ratios there is obviously no room or time for complacency and delays like the broadband rollout now "sometime in 2000" vs. earlier plans "by June" is a minor discouragement. Well enough second guessing. I am happy with yesterdays' report (though I was not and am not convinced it is the sole answer for the stock to go to the moon) and really like the fact that the page views were up even though SI posts were supposed to be down this year. It is still a loooonnnng ways from Yahoo 600 million page views, but it is a good start. Hey, I actually got this one right: .18c (pro forma) Message 13354653