Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (106542)	4/18/2000 2:26:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573920

RE:"If AMD ever hit $160, Paul will have no more scoreboards or outdated charts to thrown in our faces. <G>" When you look around at some of the crap stocks that are getting high PEs and high stock prices...they maybe beat estimates by a few cents or maybe, like MU...miss by a mile... Then I look at AMD and say why not $160/share? AMD DOUBLED earnings estimates and may well do that again next Q. Flopping around in the $70s is ridiculous as ridiculous gets. OTOH, don't be calling me the new "niceguy". <G>

To: Kenith Lee who wrote (106542)	4/18/2000 2:38:00 PM
From: TimF	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1573920

RE: If AMD ever hit $160, Paul will have no more scoreboards or outdated charts to thrown in our faces. <G> Even at $160 if you look at comparision charts of 60 months+ INTC looks better, but once you start getting out that far, I really begin to question how much relevance the information has to current reality. I am sure however that Paul Engel would have no such doubts as to its relevance. Tim