SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: pgerassi who wrote (106653)4/18/2000 5:28:00 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1574127
 
RE:"After this quarters report and probably the CC to come, It looks like I was correct that the banner should have read "One Millionth Coppermine Shipped From This Plant This Week" like they do in the automobile factories."

Of course you were correct. Did anyone really believe that load of FUD in the first place?

When was that last Coppermine stepping? Anyone remember?



To: pgerassi who wrote (106653)4/18/2000 5:39:00 PM
From: Mani1  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1574127
 
Pete Re <<It is EP and others that misinterpreted sign.>>

Of course. I challenged it immediately here as well as the INTC thread. Kash even defended it. As I said then there is no way Intel has a 1 million Coppermine/week run rate from only one fab.

Elmer defended that statement as vigorously as Paul defended the lack of need of a fan with 1 GHz coppermine.

Mani


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News