SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Anthony @ Equity Investigations, Dear Anthony, -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: scott_jiminez who wrote (54723)4/18/2000 6:42:00 PM
From: Mama Bear  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 122087
 
"the article about Tony in Wired never mentioned that within days of his so-called 'good trading call' ARIA had gone up substantially."

Absolutely. That violates rule #4.

Message 13445379

But don't be so egocentric. I was only referring to folks like you, not you specifically. BTW, do you realize that taking the proceeds of that ARIA short, and putting it into VASO long would have yielded much better returns than staying long ARIA? I guess you forget that the money didn't just go idle after that short sale was closed.

Message 12662292

Regards,

Barb

Note to Pevin P: I have taken your proposed rule #8 under advisement. I think it's a little to specific, and we can do better to make it a little more general.



To: scott_jiminez who wrote (54723)4/18/2000 10:52:00 PM
From: MaryinRed  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 122087
 
ah...has it occurred to anyone.....that if a "good stock" falls after a call...by someone with a rather large following....that ....the "selling" activity....could cause a temporary direction change... and when those folks....change directions again.... it goes back..??

i.e. ARIAD is tracking along just fine...is called a sell...folks follow...and sell short....then the call is made to cover...and bam...it pops back up...

just a thought.....could explain the effect you describe.

Mary