Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jmanvegas who wrote (70855)	4/18/2000 8:38:00 PM
From: KY	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 152472

jmanvegas, I remember when you made your "dead money" call a while back. And you know what, you were absolutely correct. After such a huge runup followed by QCOM's precipitous drop, you don't just jump back to new highs. Months of digestion would be normal. I really have no idea why this thread has such a problem with your call. Unfortunately for us QCOM stock holders, you were right. There's enough emotional investors on these boards. Good to have a cold blooded TA point of view...good or bad. KY

To: jmanvegas who wrote (70855)	4/18/2000 10:16:00 PM
From: waverider	Respond to of 152472

>>>I think my calls for the last few months regarding the "dead money" trading range have been accurate.<<< True, but we still have another quarter to go as per prediction. >>>The thread police are at it again.<<< No, that's on the other thread. Go there and do something not approved of an you get cussed out in a spineless private message. Jman, this is an open thread where ALL comments are subject to others opinions. Everyone should expect to be questioned. Don't take it personally. The ignore button is for folks who can't deal with alternative views. UF can deal with them, believe me. <H>