Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Terayon - S CDMA player (TERN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jetter who wrote (803)	4/18/2000 8:58:00 PM
From: idler	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1658

A Cable Modem Maker Adds to Its Repertoire marketguide.com

To: Jetter who wrote (803)	4/18/2000 10:55:00 PM
From: uthabros	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1658

At least they don't post under the same screen name like PUKIA and friends.

To: Jetter who wrote (803)	4/19/2000 12:48:00 AM
From: Dan B.	Respond to of 1658

Jetter, Maybe and maybe not, It's obvious that Cablelabs was satisfied that it was a matter of interpretation rather than a purposeful attempt to blatantly deceive. Cablelabs could have demanded TERN change their ways(and they did ask for that as it is) while concluding there WAS prior intent to deceive. They didn't conclude there was intent to deceive, and I doubt a court will either. There would be no case if Tern's guy's believed in their own innocence all along, are aware that they intend to submit S-CDMA for DOCSIS as planned, are aware that the invitation to submit was NEVER taken away by Cablelabs, and believed the correspondence would never become a public issue, IMO. By the by, if S-CDMA is accepted, TERN is surely aware Cablelabs would likely issue a release number upon S-CDMA's inclusion, just as was the case when it was previously given the specific designation 1.2. I suspect the above is the likely truth. I could be wrong. Dan B