SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Barry Grossman who wrote (102593)4/18/2000 10:49:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Here's the News.Com spin on Intel's earnings report... Looks like the 'core' business showed 3% revenue growth and 7% profit growth when compared to last year....

John


Questions surround Intel earnings, future
By Michael Kanellos
Staff Writer, CNET News.com
April 18, 2000, 6:15 p.m. PT
update Intel today reported first-quarter earnings that beat analysts' estimates, but the next three months will be a tough time for the leading chipmaker.

The Santa Clara, Calif.-based company reported earnings of 71 cents a share, excluding several extraordinary events, coming in 2 cents above First Call's consensus analyst estimate. The figure is 32 percent better the 57 cents per share reported in the first quarter of last year. Revenue came to $8 billion, 13 percent higher than sales in the first quarter of 1999.


But company executives were far from upbeat. Intel said it underestimated PC and mobile phone demand for the first half of the year. As a result, it does not have the manufacturing capacity and other resources it needs to meet demand, and for the next three months, supplies will be constrained. Some analysts already are downgrading second-quarter expectations.

"We did not anticipate the level of demand for the first half, especially for microprocessors, chipsets and flash memory," said Andy Bryant, Intel's chief financial officer. "Supply will continue to be a challenge."

Besides that admission, Intel's first-quarter numbers themselves may be a source of debate in the financial community.

Overall, the company reported earnings of $3 billion, or 88 cents a share. But the figure included a recently unveiled tax settlement with the Internal Revenue Service that raised earnings for the quarter by $600 million, or 17 cents a share, and ignored acquisition-related costs of 10 cents a share.

Excluding these events, earnings came to 71 cents a share.

The earnings figure also includes $640 million from interest and investment activities, which is more than the $500 million Intel earlier told analysts to expect. Those activities added "a few cents" to the final earnings-per-share figure, an Intel representative said.

Last quarter, analysts split over whether the company beat estimates or simply grazed by with a boost from its investment activities. Excluding acquisition costs, Intel reported fourth-quarter earnings of 69 cents per share on revenues of $8.2 billion. Investment activities accounted for an additional 5 cents a share.

Analyst A.A. Tad LaFountain III at Needham & Co. stated in an email that one could argue that Intel beat the estimates because of unanticipated gains.

Investment income is likely to rise to $725 million in the second quarter, Intel's Bryant said. Other companies, including rival Advance Micro Devices, have seen increases in investment income as well.

More interesting to LaFountain, though, was the relatively anemic growth in microprocessor revenues and Intel's manufacturing constraints. The Intel Architecture Business Group, which makes PC components, saw revenues increase 3 percent, from $6.4 billion to $6.6 billion, from the first quarter last year. Profits for the same period for this division grew 7 percent, from $2.9 billion to $3.1 billion.

"I am perplexed how a leading supplier with a dominant market share sitting on $20 billion...and marketable investments could fail to invest enough to provide adequate supply to meet what has to be viewed as very modest demand growth," LaFountain wrote.

By contrast, Ashok Kumar, an analyst with US Bancorp, stated that microprocessor revenues will recover in the second half. Intel's problem lay more with its communications activities. Revenues from Level One, acquired for roughly $4 billion last year, appear to be in decline.

"Level One hasn't contributed to the bottom line," Kumar said. "The company continues to rely on microprocessors, which is concerning."

Although chip supplies will be tight in the second half, Intel is putting in manufacturing to ensure against more shortages in the latter half of the year, when demand picks up again.

"We will have enough output to meet demand for the second half," said Paul Otellini, general manager of the Intel Architecture Business Group. The company also will sign on more suppliers for chip packaging, which has been a problem this year.




To: Barry Grossman who wrote (102593)4/18/2000 10:58:00 PM
From: Joe NYC  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 186894
 
Barry,

Since Intel didn't lose market share, by not having additional capacity, Intel couldn't lower prices to compete any more aggressively than they did, so to that extent, you're right that they opened the door for AMD.

You may be right that Intel did not lose market share. But there were some drop-outs from the competition: NSM (partially), Cyrix, Rise, IDT. Someone is gaining market share that those companies lost - AMD.

Another variable that has to be taken into consideration is the product mix. Despite all the problems with execution, Intel still had the advantage in Q4 and Q1, since Intel's PIII and Coppermines were competing mainly against AMD's K6, and very limited quantities of Athlon.

AMD's product mix is going to change greatly: moving from low margin K6-2 to acceptable margin K6-2+ and K6-III+ in mobile market - premium product compared to mobile Celeron (deliberately crippled by Intel), Spitfire will compete with high end Celeron, mid range Coppermine, and Thunderbird will be all alone in high end (until Willamette).

In each market segment, Intel will be matched or outgunned for at least next 2 quarters. The good thing for Intel is that AMD is also capacity constrained, and therefore can't win a lot of the unit market share from Intel. But $$$ market share is shifting. Another thing to keep in mind is pricing. Even in time of tight supply, there will be pressure on Intel to cut prices, by the likes of Dell and Compaq, because the product that Intel will be selling will be inferior to the competition.

When Intel has the additional capacity later this year, I don't anticipate that AMD will be allowed to gain any market share - in fact, the opposite may occur.

If Intel was suddenly able to satisfy all the demand, you could in fact be right, and Intel could even gain market share, because AMD is capacity constrained as well. But looking to 2H 2000, AMD will be adding capacity as well, at the same or even faster pace than Intel. So the unit market share may stay the same, or we may see tiny gain by AMD. But in the share of the revenue, AMD will be making solid gains thanks to the shifting from low end product to premium product.

Joe



To: Barry Grossman who wrote (102593)4/18/2000 11:10:00 PM
From: Robert Salasidis  Respond to of 186894
 
The extra fab money is being spent this year, but do we know exactly when the fabs will be online (this info may have been contained within the news releases but I missed it).