Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Microcap & Penny Stocks : NVEI (Was NVXE) - New Visual Entertainment Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: daViking who wrote (1819)	4/24/2000 6:56:00 PM
From: CBurnett	Respond to of 2211

.91 cent drop today...couldn't happen to a more qualified stock.I enjoy watching this tick down to where it belongs.I'm still waiting for NVXE to next enter the wireless arena...LOL

To: daViking who wrote (1819)	5/15/2000 6:31:00 PM
From: CBurnett	Respond to of 2211

Another splendid day...1 7/8 GREAT !

To: daViking who wrote (1819)	5/29/2000 8:58:00 AM
From: CBurnett	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 2211

From someone who knows what this company is all about ! By: Sikuku Reply To: None Sunday, 28 May 2000 at 2:10 PM EDT Post # of 37265 During March and April I posted a number of messages which discussed NVXE's unresolved legal dispute with Mr. Jack Robinson and Astounding.com. During that time, I referred interested readers to Astounding's web page, suggesting that anyone who really wanted to understand what is at stake in this matter should review the particulars posted there for themselves. Today, in spite of the repeated denials by Mr. Willenberg, Whitehorn and the Lily Beter organization, that Astounding has any cause to pursue legal remedies to enforce its contract with NVXE, the full text of the lawsuit filed by Mr. Robinson and Astounding can be read in its entirety simply by accessing www.astounding.com. To those who continue to insist that (1) the matter has been resolved without litigation, (2) Astounding has no ligitimate claim, (3) Astounding's claims are irrelevant, (4) Mr. Robinson's claims have been rendered mute by Lily Beter's most recent filings, or (5) NVXE is the Plaintiff in the case because it filed a lawsuit first, I suggest you read the summons and complaint with particular attention to the provisions which deal with the nature of NVXE's prior lawsuit. The lawsuit filed by Lily Beter/NVXE in Austin, Texas, in April, asks the Texas Court to rescind and nullify the letter of intent entered into between NVXE and Astounding. The lawsuit was filed but never served on Mr. Robinson - it was, as I predicted, a sham intended to demonstrate NVXE's privileged right to strike first and put the matter on hold by compelling Mr. Robinson to forestall further action while waiting to be served with the complaint. When it became obvious that NVXE's management had no intention of serving process or prosecuting the lawsuit, Mr. Robinson contracted with his own attorneys to go to the court in Austin and retrieve a copy of the suit for himself. The suit filed by Astounding seeks damages arising from the breach of a formal contract agreement between NVXE and Astounding. It points to the October 5, 1999, news release prepared and circulated by Mr. Willenberg, which states clearly and unequivocally that Mr. Robinson and his associates paid $1 million into NVXE, as substantial performance under the agreement. The formal contract between NVXE and Astounding replaced and therefore nullified the prior memorandum agreement, which is the subject of NVXE's specious claims. The fact that no one in management at NVXE, Whitehorn or Lily Beter has made a formal disclosure to any of the NVXE shareholders regarding the filing of the suit by Astounding or Mr. Robninson's clearly demonstrated intent to vigorously prosecute adjudication of his claims, should be a matter of serious concern for NVXE's shareholders. The failure to immediately disclose the particulars related to this matter constitute a serious breach of Lily Beater's fiduciary obligation and violates the standing rules which govern the conduct of both NVXE and Whitehorn with regard to their obligation to make such dislosures. The predictions I made in April, which anticipated the filing of the Astounding lawsuit against NVXE, the railroad job acquisition of Intelecon by NVXE at the insistence of Jon Maxmin and Lily Beter Group, the SEC investigation of Whitehorn's failure to disclose material issues of fact related to NVXE's shareholder dealings and the claims of the New Wheel Technology Group, the imposition of $40 million of junk bond debt financing on the Company, the impending likelihood of a 4:1 reverse merger by management to recover control of a greater number of treasury shares, and the appropriation of unissued shares to friends and associates of Mr. Willenberg in order to maintain voting control in a small, carefully controlled group of insiders, have now largely been fulfilled. It will be more than interesting to discover the impact, if any, of disclosure of these matters on the conduct of the shareholder's meeting in Dallas. It is now a fact, I believe, that Mr. Willenberg, Jon Maxmin/ Lily Beter, Joe Passalaqua and his controlled companies, and Intelecon together vote absolute control of NVXE's stock. How this has come to be has never been fully disclosed in any of the press releases, SEC filings or postings associated with this or any other message board. I suggest you govern yourselves accordingly.