Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tim McCormick who wrote (102681)	4/19/2000 1:49:00 PM
From: silverstein	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

Are you implying that a single successful guess on AMD makes this analyst credible? How about the rest of his track record. SDS

To: Tim McCormick who wrote (102681)	4/19/2000 2:45:00 PM
From: SisterMaryElephant	Respond to of 186894

Tim, <He [T.A. Lafontain] was the only one with a strong buy on AMD in the teens> Tad was right on AMD for the wrong reasons. His reasoning is that AMD would succeed at Intel's expense. He was wrong both about Intel's performance and stock price. Proof? His price target on Intel was $58. Intel is over $100 and earnings are well over $2 billion. AMD's success is not dependent on Intel's failure. IMO, he has not grasped this very simple yet obvious concept, and they pay him big bucks. Regards, SK