Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (40449)	4/20/2000 9:31:00 AM
From: jim kelley	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 93625

Re: the 840 PC800 has better memory latency than SDRAM Actually, you are wrong. The chart shows that only the Apollo BX PC133 occasionally got slightly lower scores than the 840 PC800 at low bandwidth. The Apollo a Pro 133 did worse than the 840 PC800 at the low bandwidths and about the same as the 840 PC600. The SDRAM system latencies started to fall apart at about 375 MB/sec and all were significantly worse than even the 820 PC800 at 440 MB/sec. All the SDRAM based systems had terrible latency at 500 to 600 MB/sec compared to the 820 and 840 systems. JK