Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: im a survivor who wrote (15505)	4/20/2000 4:56:00 PM
From: Jeffry K. Smith	Respond to of 35685

KG - once again, you twist words, or simply make up things. first you admitt to doing very little DD and knowing very little about the company, yet you can claim it to have weak attributes?? I admit no such thing, because it is simply not the case. I did my DD, and felt that for a few days, to skim some option premium off, it was worth my investment. Your concerned because I favorably mention a stock you dont find worthy!!! Man, you are too much. I thought it was my right to favorably mention something I like and I am thrilled you dont find it worthy...I suggest you stay away from it, dont buy it, and dont worry about it. I never questioned your right to speak, did I? But, I am concerned that anyone else who looks into this stock (because I did my DD and have been following it) do so deeply, and exercised my right to say so. So I follow a company for years...know people involved with the company and it's technology and I am not allowed to say I like it...not allowed to..."mention it favorably", as you say ???? I never said any such thing. You need to take a peek at my history of posts. I think you will see the furthest thing I am is someone that runs around hyping something...anything, and if I do say something positive or negative, I usually have pretty good reasoning. I did not use the words "pushing" or "hyping" to describe your actions, because I don't feel you are that sort of person. In all honesty, though, I have wondered why you mentioned IARC so much - but of course we all have a right to our opinions. I could go on and on to refute your ridiculous, or outright "straw man" charges, but I think there has been enough bandwidth wasted on the matter. At this point, you are not responding to what I have posted at all, so let's call a truce. I did not mean my original comment as a personal attack, and sincerely apologize since you took it that way. I do, however, stand by all the other points I have made. Depending on one's investment horizon, and tolerance for risk, IARC may be a home-run. I hope it is for you. As I said, I think one needs to look very, very hard at it. Jeff Smith