Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bambs who wrote (34266)	4/20/2000 9:22:00 PM
From: The Phoenix	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 77400

Fine.. this conversation is quickly deteriorating. YOu have your arguments which if one believes one should follow. I have my own which I will choose to follow. Again this is what makes the market - differing opinions. However I'd like to make one last comment and one final point. Comment: I find it rather presumptuous of you (and I take exception) to calling the longs here "dumb" and uninformed. And to suggest that I'm "playing" a game is as ridiculous as me suggesting you're trying to talk down the stock. I'm long because I believe I've got at least another double in this pup and I believe this is a long term core holding. Final Point: Your points earlier.. IBM revs of 88B grew at 7% = 6.16B INTC revs of 30B grew 12% = 3.6B MSFT at 23B grew 22% = 5.1B CSCO 1999 at $12B grew at 44% = $4.3B CSCO 2000 est at $18B grew at 50% = $6.0B I see no correlation to size here. I do see a correlation to business type. I also see CSCO accelerating not decelerating as you suggest will occur next year with no supporting data. Therefore this argument has no basis whatsoever. But like I said you're entitled to your opinion but please don't suggest that I have any alterior motives other than to own a part of the greatest run company on earth - one that I think has it's greatest days in front of it. OG