Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Square_Dealings who wrote (47549)	4/21/2000 1:13:00 AM
From: Haim R. Branisteanu	Respond to of 99985

* OT * Michael the guy is right and I hope he wins in Court. The conduct is part of the arrogance of WS induced by this bubble. Unfortunate he will suffer much more emotional pain fighting them even that he is rigth. The attorneys will give him hell ... another type of abuse and violation of civil and human rights ... I went trough it and won. The bank who refused to pay my an fee for my work (for saving them substantial losses on a big loan and their client from getting bust) was the sixth biggest bank in the US. At the end after all the litigation time I got paid teh equivalent of $15 per hour instead the $175 and that is exactly what they want.( As you know Courts ussually do not award attorney's fee and litigation time) I can guaranty you that an affiliate of Pru bougt the securities and later sold them at higher prices. Classic conduct of ROBBER BARRONS, BWDIK Haim