Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Idea Of The Day -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: James Strauss who wrote (31264)	4/21/2000 9:36:00 PM
From: Jerry Olson	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 50167

Jim OO?? what the hell is that<g>//??? i think we'll have another whipsaw city week , with a bias to the downside,, i'll buy the last dip when everyone thinks it's doom and gloom time... regards..Juice.

To: James Strauss who wrote (31264)	4/22/2000 9:09:00 PM
From: megazoo	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50167

James et al All the technicians I know are adamant in saying that the Nasdaq has to test double bottom at 3250 or so, in order for it to move higher with force. Does that mean that anytime there has been a big dip in Nasdaq, (or Dow for that matter), has it always retested that bottom, and then moved higher. You could argue that when Nasdaq ran up from 3000 to 5000 three months ago, it did face some dips, albeit very light ones, from 4000 to 3700, etc. But it went straight up after that. Of course, you could also argue the fact that Nasdaq is here at this level, because the moves were not sustained. On another note, analogous to contrarian indication of the put/call ratio, I have a hunch that the Nasdaq may NOT retest 3300, ONLY BECAUSE all the technicians that I have seen or heard say otherwise.