SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: PROLIFE who wrote (17256)4/22/2000 3:50:00 AM
From: E  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769670
 
I'd like, in exchange for your "shouted" information, to paste a few excerpted quotes for the consideration of our readers. They are from the article to be found at the url below. Then, at the end, I have a question to "shout" at you, if you don't mind.

tnr.com

"The
majority of cases in which there is a
fertilized egg result in the non-realization
of a person...

Of those
embryos that do trigger pregnancy, only
around 65 percent lead to live births, even
with the best prenatal care. The rest are
lost to natural miscarriage. All told, only
about one-third of sperm-egg unions result
in babies, even when abortion is not a
factor...

More generally, the evidence that
two-thirds of conceptions fail regardless
of abortion provides a powerful new
argument in favor of choice in the early
trimesters...

Most neurologists
assume that electrical activity in the first
trimester represents random neuron firings
as nerves connect--basically, tiny spasms...
"

And in response to this post of yours:

<<TWENTY FOUR DAYS-------HEART BEGINS TO BEAT

FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>

let me ask you this:

SO SINCE THERE IS NO SPASM OF THE EMBRYONIC HEART TISSUE UNTIL THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY, DOES THAT MEAN YOU'LL LET A NON-CHRISTIAN WOMAN REMOVE A ZYGOTE FROM HER UTERUS WITH THE MORNING-AFTER PILL?




To: PROLIFE who wrote (17256)4/22/2000 4:42:00 AM
From: E  Respond to of 769670
 
<<<TWENTY FOUR DAYS-------HEART BEGINS TO BEAT

FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>>

PROLIFE, something is bothering me about what you have posted here.

I believe, to put it bluntly, that it contains a lie.

I believe that the "heart's" energy output is not "20% OF ADULTS".

I believe you put that there because you felt it was persuasive, and made the small cell cluster, the bit of embryonic tissue in development toward a human heart, including regular electrical pulses, seem more like a teeny, but completed, and quite powerfully beating, little human heat. (I think those electrical pulses are random in the developing brain and regular in the developing heart, but I'm not sure about this.)

I think you want us to believe that a forty day old fetus has a heart that produces 1/5, or 20% of the energy that your heart produces.

But that isn't true, is it?

I'll tell you what might be true, though, PROLIFE. I figured this out by asking myself what would be the cover excuse for such a lie.

Now, I'll admit I have no scientific knowledge about this; I am going to provide my theory based purely on my conviction, based on an assessment of the typical argument ethics I have noted among anti-abortion zealots, that you have provided misinformation that either you or its originator knew was a lie; and on my attempt to figure out how the originator of the lie would work up a rationale for it.

How does this guess sound, as a guess for the rationalization for the lie?--

"Well [you will say], I didn't mean <<FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>, what I really meant to say was that if the tissue of the fetus, which weighs, say, a few ounces, were blown up in weight and volume several hundred-fold, until, though it was the same type of tissue, with the same spasmodic "twitch" in the heart cells (though no developed circulatory system to pump blood through yet, I imagine)-- it now weighed two hundred pounds!... well, then THAT TWO HUNDRED POUND FETUS would have a neurological event taking place in the heart tissue, like a "beat" without a pump, that produced 1/5 of the energy a 200 pound adult human heart produces!"

Now I am not a scientist, but I do have a good built in lie detector. And I have gone out on a limb here. If you show me that the the statement you "shouted" here,

<<<FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>>

is true, I will certainly have to apologize for my mistrust and rudeness.

Was it a lie, PROLIFE? Perhaps one that took you in? Or do you still claim that at forty days the fetal heart's energy output is 1/5 that of an adult's heart?

Or do you have some... uh... modification... or clarification... you would like to make, involving blowing that fetus WAY up, a couple of hundred pounds up, to get to that 20% figure you shouted here?



To: PROLIFE who wrote (17256)4/22/2000 6:01:00 PM
From: E  Respond to of 769670
 
PROLIFE, I replied to the post to which I'm now again replying with these thoughts.

siliconinvestor.com

In brief, I believed that your "shouted" claim,

<<<FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>>

Was a lie, and said so, though I left open the door for correction, because I am not a scientist. I said my suspicions were increased "based on an assessment of the typical argument-ethics I have noted among anti-abortion zealots."

Now here is your extremely interesting reply of today addressing the "lie" issue: (A response which was not linked to my post pointing out the lie.)

<<<This information has been around for years. I did not decide myself what it was, as you suggest.>>>

What does "decide for myself what it was" even mean, for goodness sake? That you didn't create the truth of it, or didn't create the lie it tells??

The question is, did you post the lie knowingly or in ignorance? It has an answer only you can give us.

Unfortunately, you just chose to reassociate yourself with the lie, perhaps in confusion, with the very words that should have triggered your worst fears:

<<<This information has been around for years.>>>

You have just told us that the "prolife" movement has been disseminating this "information" -- which is misinformation -- for years.

And by clear implication, you have also told us that in your mind, a lie told often enough really does become truth. These words:

<<<FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>

present a lie, and you offer this: "This information has been around for years."

How vile. How disgusting. How unconscionable. How cruel. How utterly, utterly, creepy of you and your movement.

Last night I intuited (using only common sense and my observation of the ethics of many spokespersons of your movement) that you would rationalize the lie with some "clarification" along the lines of "I meant if you blew the fetus up by several hundred times its heart would output 1/5 of the energy of an adult heart!"

Today, having spent a few minutes with Jeeves, I have more information. It confirms that my intuition that you were posting, knowingly or unknowingly (I waited for an indication of which it was) a lie when you posted this: <<<FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>>.

Here are a few facts that will tell you whether the above is or is not a lie that you and your movement have been disseminating "for years."

FACT: At six to seven weeks (40 days is 2 days less than the lower of those figures) the fetus and heartbeat are usually visible on transvaginal sonogram.

Do you understand what that says? It tells you that not always, but usually, by the time you reach 40 days-- plus 2 more that I'm giving you as a bonus-- a sonogram across the vagina can SEE the fetus. Maybe. And maybe you can even detect the neural twitch of the tissue that is to become a human heart. PROCHOICE, do you believe that these firing neurons, pumping no blood, in the only-sometimes-even-visible fetus (so tiny is it) are "ouputting energy" 20% of that "outputted" by a developed, pumping, adult, human heart?

PROLIFE, that is a lie. Please repudiate it.

FACT: By the end of the second month the fetus is about an inch long and still weighs less than an ounce.

Okay. The "end of the second month" means at sixty days. I couldn't find a forty day table, but will estimate 40 day length and weight by deducting 1/3 of the sixty day length and weight, giving us this rough estimate: The fetus at 40 days is 2/3 of an inch long and weighs less than 2/3 of an ounce.

PROLIFE, do you believe that this 2/3 inch long, less than 2/3 ounce cluster of cells which can't always be detected even by sonogram is "ouputting energy" 20% of that "outputted" by a developed, pumping, adult, human heart?

PROLIFE, repudiate the lie that you have been spreading for years. Tell me that you are going to take it on yourself to stop your movement from continuing to spread that lie.

Now I shall, for my amusement and your edification, update the rationalization I expected you would produce for us today. If you have been, yourself, duped by the lie, it would not be you, but its original inventor, who will have this rationalization in his or her back pocket. I assume you will track the source down and share your findings with us.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Lie-Rationalization Update Guess~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is what I am guessing they will have to say -- if you take them to task, which surely you will! -- as a cover for having spread that lie that you and you movement have been spreading "for years":

"Oh, we didn't mean that the fraction of the 2/3 ounce group of cells that are programmed to become the heart itself produces an <<<ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS>>>!! Nooooo! No way! That would be just too silly! Why, do you take us for fools? Nooooooo!.. What we meant was THIS:

That if you made the 2/3 inch long, 2/3 ounce fetus larger! by multiplying it! Yeah, that's it, by multiplying its weight by 4,200! (the number of times 2/3 of an ounce goes into an adult 200 pounds)...

Then, you see, if you had a 200 pound fetus, FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% OF ADULTS!!! See? That's the ticket! Proportionality!

Yeah, that's what we meant, a two hundred pound fetus... OR!!! Wait! You could do it this way!-- PROPORTIONALITY IS THE KEY, yeah, that's it, proportionality! -- You could reduce the height of a 200 pound adult to... let's see... well, all you have to do (PROPORTIONALITY!!!) is to shrink the six foot adult down to a height of... 2/3 of an inch or so? Yeah, that's it, that's what we meant, all we have been saying for years is that

<<<FORTY DAYS------------HEART'S ENERGY OUTPUT AT 20% (OF a 2/3 INCH TALL ADULTS.)>>>

Yeah, that's it.