Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scarecrow who wrote (66815)	4/22/2000 9:40:00 PM
From: jimpit	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 67261

Scarecrow, Thanks for making me aware of the other thread with your link. Regards, Jim _______________________________________________________ NewsMax.com newsmax.com With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff For the story behind the story... Saturday April 22, 2000 Legal Analysts Comment on Raid Andrew Napolitano, legal analyst for Fox News and a constitutional scholar had this exchange today on Fox with Eric Holder, Reno's second in command at Justice: Napolitano: Tell me, Mr. Holder, why did you not get a court order authorizing you to go in and get the boy? Holder: Because we didn't need a court order. INS can do this on its own. Napolitano: You know that a court order would have given you the cloak of respectability to have seized the boy. Holder: We didn't need an order. Napolitano: Then why did you ask the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals for such an order if you didn't need one? Holder: [Silence] Napolitano: The fact is, for the first time in history, you have taken a child from his residence at gunpoint to enforce your custody position, even though you did not have an order authorizing it. newsmax.com All Rights Reserved ¸ NewsMax.com ______________________________________________________