Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: E who wrote (17331)	4/23/2000 3:58:00 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769667

I did indeed say that I have considered acceptance of the morning- after pill as part of a comprehensive settlement, although I am not certain. I do not think that discouraging abortion in the first trimester is giving the fetus more rights than the mother, it is deciding in its favor on the continuation of life. The mother otherwise retains substantial control over her life, although she may be discommoded, and is free to relinquish the child after birth. Furthermore, a determined woman will always find a way to have an abortion, especially if most states do what I expect, and are relatively lenient during that period. But at least the law will have made it likelier that she will have given it thought, and approached it with some seriousness, instead of treating human organisms as so much trash.....