Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : John Pitera's Market Laboratory -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1252)	4/23/2000 9:51:00 PM
From: Rich1	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

GZ read the same piece on another thread. Hope you are right.

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1252)	4/23/2000 9:57:00 PM
From: John Pitera	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

Hi Paul, Hope that you had a fabulous Holiday weekend. too funny, I just posted the same article on the Wild World of Stocks thread, I thought this was a bit too cheerleady for me to post so I was hoping to bury it on a post to myself on the WWoS thread. He does make some valid points..... I could believe we have a period of time where we contract the trading ranges and the volatility. Those who own stocks own them were they are and things might well calm down. John

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1252)	4/23/2000 10:12:00 PM
From: LTK007	Respond to of 33421

that RSI for NASD is very interesting,and i see it's last several buy signals(up to now) were a just plain dead-on---that is why i am looking for a violation of TA at this,for me,a still cautionary phase--if,for instance we were to soon break-below the most recent buy signal,it would be a major break with past behavoir--i guess what i am saying,for me to go bear-call,i want to see a "violation" of recent times reliable TA indicators.PaxMax

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1252)	4/24/2000 8:06:00 AM
From: Defrocked	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 33421

If the oscillator shown is to be believed, then one should have sold many more times that bought during the last two years. Doesn't this say something about the accuracy of oscillators in general during a trending market????

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (1252)	4/24/2000 7:06:00 PM
From: bobby beara	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 33421

>>>Based upon what occurred in October of 1998<<< in 1998 there wasn't such a massive divergence between the nasdaq and the broader market indexes, or between the nasdaq and the nyse advance decline line (i'm using ko as a proxy for that on this chart) quicken.com the weekly candles on the sept/oct. 98 bottoms were both hammers, this one was on a big giant black candle off a parabolic top. the rubber band has already been stretched, now it's goin boing -g- b