Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (102829)	4/23/2000 10:06:00 PM
From: philipah	Respond to of 186894

Whisper #s - Good article. Liberated from ORCL thread. Message 13484652 P

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (102829)	4/23/2000 10:12:00 PM
From: Mani1	Respond to of 186894

Tench re <<How many gigahertz Athlons did AMD ship in Q1? How many Athlons at 900 MHz and above did AMD ship?>> I don't know, I don't know, I DONT KNOW! And I never claimed to know. And I am not saying that AMD shipped more high MHz part than Intel. And how do you know how much Intel shipped "for a fact"? you don't know that unless you are very high up the food chain in the manufacturing side, which you are not. Mani

To: Tenchusatsu who wrote (102829)	4/23/2000 11:05:00 PM
From: kash johal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Tench, re:Number of high speed Athlons as 10K. No specific number of 1Ghz Athlons was Given by Jerry. He stated that TENS of THOUSANDs of Athlons of 900Mhz and greater were shipped(vast majority were 1Ghz I believe). And in Q2 it would be HUNDREDS of THOUSANDS. If we assume that 50K 1Ghz AThlons were shipped. Thats roughly 5% of Athlons. Intel shipped 12-13M Cumines. 5% would be 600K plus. And we know fer sure that Intel shipped no way near this number. BTW the market growth YOY was expected to be 15-18%. Intel's growth YOY on Q1 was FAR less than this kind of growth: either in UNITS or DOLLARS. Microssoft/GTW/ROW has complained about poor INTEL CPU availability as lowering growth and revenue. So why are FOLKS not willing to state the facts: INTEL is having yield or manufacturing problems. Despite all the sugarcoating and BS from the Intel fudsters. regards, Kash