SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (17369)4/24/2000 1:39:00 AM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 

I refer you to the current debate on "gun control", a euphemism for civil disarmament.


Clinton has de-escalated to "gun safety" for a while. Hunters can breath easy, he used to hunt when he was younger. Let's see... in 1934 a $200 tax on a $10 shotgun shouldn't be construed as infringing on 2nd. And it was eerily similar to the Stamp Act of 1765, which sought revenue from newspaper, legal and commercial documents. Thompson sub-machine guns sold at Sears for $125 and silencers were $2 (still legal in Sweden for hunting...saves the hearing) and a Ford worker made about $200 a month. If only Miller had showed up in court with his attorney (or the NRA) after all shotguns were issued for military use and Stevens sold them.



To: Jacques Chitte who wrote (17369)4/24/2000 2:12:00 AM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 769667
 
gun control
I find it puzzling that conservatives have the idea that if the government becomes a dictatorship that widespread availability of small caliber weapons would stop the process. That is not how dictatorships obtain and hold onto power. The only safety in this regard is institutional. The government needs to be kept divided among different branches and parties while the people jealously guard their freedom of speech, press, and honest elections. Guns (and drugs) are mainly an issue of public health.
TP