SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (78825)4/24/2000 1:16:00 AM
From: Neocon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
You may be right about that, and I have conflicts about the whole business. You know me well enough by now to know that I wish everyone who wanted to could be an American, but that is not practical. You object to affording some special privileges. I consider it to be somewhat like a lottery. Most people would think it fair if we could only take in a thousand youngsters a year, but their names were picked at random. I consider it fair that Elian has the good fortune to benefit from his mother's sacrifice, his relatives' prosperity, and the exemptions written into law. As I said, I do not know what the final determination should be, but I consider the privilege question to be a pretty lame basis for deciding against asylum. Besides, we are at liberty to be hostile to Castro, and to be friendly to Cubans, if we wish. There is no rule against partiality in an instance where no one else has a particular claim and where we can help some, but not all.....



To: jbe who wrote (78825)4/24/2000 5:53:00 AM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 108807
 
I don't know how you can be so sure. There is one law for aliens seeking asylum. There are many courts not at all subject to Miami Cuban pressure (11th CA eg). These cases are sub judice. Anyone who respects his scholarly reputation will not make such unsupportable statements.
(sorry to hear about the death of Vann Woodward).