Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Int'l Wayside Gold Mines Ltd (IWA-VSE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Little Joe who wrote (981)	4/24/2000 12:59:00 PM
From: bully	Respond to of 1321

No wonder the majors are dancing all around this property... A little premature to call 5,000,000 ounces IMO but the potential is certainly there ! "BULLY"!,b>

To: Little Joe who wrote (981)	4/24/2000 2:48:00 PM
From: rulm	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1321

Are you the Easter bunny, by any chance ? Wow, 5,000,000 ounces of Au already ? This plus Bully's potential should get you guys another Hemlo. Who'd have thunk it- 1000's and 1000's of Companies and claims since the mid 1800's and all of a sudden, kabamba....Hemlo west. How could they miss such an elephant ? Ain't no stinking stringer veins up there, is there, Little Joe ? Naw, stringer veins are for the losers. Just big jawhompum ore bodies in Wells, HUH?

To: Little Joe who wrote (981)	4/24/2000 5:40:00 PM
From: Claude Cormier	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1321

LJ, <<Simple estimates on my part taking in length X width X depth and multiplying the tonnage by .33 ounces per ton now gives over 5 million ounces.>> I am getting much less than 1M ounces. I guess we are not using the same parameters ? But we agree on the grade. BTW, you must multiply the volume in cubic meters (L * W * D) by the SG which is the specific gravity. This will gives you the tonnage.

To: Little Joe who wrote (981)	4/25/2000 7:20:00 PM
From: Elizabeth Andrews	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1321

This is baloney, Joe. There's barely a resource here at all. The strike length between holes bc2k-8 and bc2k-13 is less than 400 FEET-feet Joe not meters! And, there's no evidence in a drill hole that the thick zone encountered exists down dip. Why haven't they published hole bc2k-9??? If it's anything like the section in holes 10 and 11 then the zone will be small. I'd guess that the best intervals are in the nose of folds and there won't be much tonnage here. But,although I'm not from Kansas, maybe you should show us your calculations, okay?