SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Gerald Walls who wrote (43222)4/24/2000 2:51:00 PM
From: Insitu  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
I'm not saying that MSFT isn't or wasn't a threat to anyone. They clearly were and are. MSFT broke the law and must pay the price. My only argument is that a cash penalty, and a huge one at that, is better than either a breakup or other DOJ monitoring of future products.



To: Gerald Walls who wrote (43222)4/24/2000 8:02:00 PM
From: Hal Rubel  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 74651
 
Tribute

POINT: "That's why a massive fine would be better than a breakup. We could all move on, with the DOJ and states a lot richer and MSFT a lot poorer."

COUNTER POINT: "Hell, a fine was all that was needed, but those types of fines are called "political contributions" or more accurately "tribute".

I agree. One thing made clear at the trial was that some of that money is ours. A massive fine would be mere tribute. It would just be a tax on a feudal lord, the payment of which would constitute a federal license from on high.

What good would a fine of any size do to relieve the underlieing injustice? Cutting the feds in on a share of the loot is not the answer. It will just institutionalize the current mess. The more MSFT gouges out of the public, the more Gates and the Feds make as partners in crime.

It's one thing to be paying our taxes to the government. It's another to be paying levies to the Fed's liege Lord Gates too. Medieval.

I say, No Way. Make things right.

Hal