SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Chas. who wrote (25760)4/25/2000 6:15:00 PM
From: Rocket Red  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Winspear Resources Ltd -
Winspear Snap Lake prefeasibility raises cash flow 66%
Winspear Resources Ltd WSP
Shares issued 51,634,088 2000-04-24 close $2.1
Tuesday Apr 25 2000

Mr. Randy Turner reports
Results have been received from the prefeasibility study prepared by MRDI Canada, a division of AGRA Simons Limited (MRDI), for the Snap Lake diamond project on the Camsell Lake joint venture property. This property is located approximately 220 kilometres northeast of Yellowknife, NWT, and is controlled by the Camsell Lake joint venture of which Winspear is the majority owner and operator.
The total minable tonnage included by MRDI in the study is 12,592,100 tonnes of kimberlite at an average grade of 1.75 carats per tonne containing more than 22 million recoverable carats. This represents a 53-per-cent increase in minable tonnage relative to that used in MRDI's September, 1999, scoping study of the project. The after-tax cash flow for the project is calculated at $1.222-billion which represents a 66-per-cent increase over that in the scoping study. The after-tax discounted cash flow rate of return (DCFROR) is calculated as 37.6 per cent and the pay-back period is reduced to 2.1 years from 3.6 years in the scoping study.
The prefeasibility study is based on kimberlite of the NW dike on which a global resource of 21.32 million tonnes grading 1.97 carats per tonne has been defined. This global resource does not include results of six holes drilled north and east of the resource area in late 1999 or those drilled in 2000.
In preparation of the prefeasibility study, MRDI reviewed the classification of the global resource at Snap Lake with the result that indicated resources increased by 29 per cent to 12.05 million tonnes at 1.96 carats per tonne. Inferred resources now stand at 9.27 million tonnes at 1.97 carats per tonne.
The mine plan developed in the prefeasibility study is based on part of this global resource.
MRDI has developed a base case mining plan that includes a sustained mining rate of 3,000 tonnes per day for 12 years. This plan only considers the first phase of development of the Snap Lake deposit and is limited to that portion of the NW dike for which kimberlite occurs above 80 metres above sea level (approximately 350 metres below surface) and exceeds two metres true thickness. Based on these parameters, the estimated minable resource is 12,394,000 tonnes with an average grade of 1.98 carats per tonne. After allowing for mining dilution of 13 per cent and partial recovery of the pillars upon cessation of mining, the minable tonnage is calculated by MRDI as follows:

NW dike - minable Tonnage

Classification Tonnes Grade
(carats per tonne)

Indicated 10,753,600 1.74
Inferred 1,838,500 1.83

Total 12,592,100 1.75


The estimated minable tonnage does not include results from holes drilled within the global resources in 2000. In the mine plan, approximately 185,000 tonnes will be mined from an open pit on the NW peninsula with the remainder to be recovered by underground mining using room and pillar methods. In most areas outlined for underground mining, kimberlite recovery will be 100 per cent. This is achieved by replacing 10 per cent of the mined kimberlite with high-strength concrete and the remaining 90 per cent with cemented paste backfill.
The process plant will be designed with a gravity feed to minimize diamond damage during separation and will incorporate the latest hands-off diamond concentrating processes.
Proposed site facilities to support the project will include a 300-person camp, an 1,820-metre landing strip sized for 737 and Hercules aircraft, a processed kimberlite containment facility, waste rock storage areas, a paste plant, various storage buildings, diesel fuel storage capacity for 28 million litres, and a storage facility for six million litres of propane used to heat mine air.
WWW International Diamond Consultants Ltd. (WWW) had previously estimated a value of $105 (U.S.) per carat based on over 10,000 carats of diamonds obtained from processing 6,000 tonnes of kimberlite from the subcrop of the NW dike. This price was used in the scoping study. Since that time, diamond prices have generally increased. In preparation for a financial analysis of the proposed development of the Snap Lake deposit, WWW undertook a repricing of these diamonds while taking care to be conservative and not to consider in its repricing the large price increases that have characterized the market recently. WWW's new recommended value for these diamonds of $118 (U.S.) per carat, a price increase of approximately 12 per cent. This has been incorporated into the financial analysis for the prefeasibility study at an exchange rate of $1.45 (Canadian) = $1 (U.S.).
MRDI has estimated that the initial capital cost for the Snap Lake project will be $269.4-million prior to production which includes a provision of $24.9-million for contingencies. In addition, provision has been made for working capital of $50.8-million in the year prior to production. Because of changes in the mining plan and schedule, the new cost estimates are not directly comparable with those in the scoping study. Operating costs for the 3,000-tonne-per-day base case, including mining, processing, freight, power, and general and administration, have been estimated at $93.62 per tonne over the life of the mine, an increase of approximately 30 per cent over the scoping study estimate. MRDI states that costs are correct to within +/- 25 per cent.
Previously announced capital and operating cost estimates for the Snap Lake project were based on the scoping study which assumed two years of open pit production followed by underground mining. The prefeasibility study includes reduced open pit mine operations and a significant increase in underground development that is completed during the preproduction period. The cost of that development, of additional facilities associated with the need for high-strength pillars underground and for mine air heating, as well as more rigorous design and cost estimation, results in an overall increase in the capital cost estimate. Increases in the estimated operating costs result mainly from the purchase, transportation, and storage of additional operating supplies for high-strength concrete pillars and mine air heating.
This prefeasibility study has demonstrated that the Snap Lake diamond project is financially robust and capable of development at a sustained rate of 3,000 tonnes per day. Additional information to be obtained from the continuing program at the Snap Lake site will provide diamond values from samples recovered by mining under Snap Lake and practical estimates of mining conditions in this environment for incorporation into the feasibility study. The present schedule for the project anticipates that the regulatory process leading to production permits will begin within six weeks and that the feasibility study will be finalized toward year-end. With the co-operation of consultants, contractors, regulators and aboriginal groups, construction will begin in mid-2001, open pit mining in the third quarter 2002, commissioning in late 2002, and full production in the first quarter 2003.
Winspear notes that although the Snap Lake project as considered by the prefeasibility study defines a significant project in its own right, the study is based on only a portion of the resource potential identified on the property. Only approximately 60 per cent of the global tonnage defined on the NW dike has been considered by MRDI in defining the mine plan presented in the prefeasibility study. Additional development potential is represented by 4.18 million tonnes of kimberlite that is between one and two metres thickness. Given the margin between operating cost and kimberlite value, the 2.0-metre thickness criteria used in the study does not represent the lower limit for economic mining. In addition, significant resources have been defined below 80 metres of elevation within the area containing the global tonnage. Additional work is required to determine the most economic way to mine this kimberlite. Furthermore, additional tonnage beyond the area of the global tonnage estimate is indicated by diamond drill intersections obtained in the fall of 1999 and by the continuing drill program on the property. As these resources become better defined by future programs, consideration will be given as to the optimum way of integrating these resources into the planned operation.
While additional design work will be continuing, all aspects of the prefeasibility proposal will be examined in detail with a view to optimizing project economics. Winspear is very encouraged with results of the prefeasibility study and anticipates timely completion of a feasibility study on the project.

(c) Copyright 2000 Canjex Publishing Ltd. canada-stockwatch.com

old url (better for printing)



To: Chas. who wrote (25760)4/26/2000 1:50:00 AM
From: Taz  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 26850
 
Chuck: In response to yer questions.

Who do you think will be up and into production first Winspear or Aber ?

The Diavik project will likely be in production prior to Snap despite the technical difficulties they face. DDMI has a good jump start on the Snap project as far as the regulatory aspect is concerned, so that gives them a real edge. But the coffee shop crowd is still hedging their bets simply because of the type of deposit at Snap and the potential to fast track a smaller project with less surface impact and fewer technical difficulties. Some will try and collect their bets early on the basis that having a plant on the Snap site processing underground ore constitutes production, bulk sample or not. However money will not change hands until a full fledged mill built on one of the two sites is processing ore from production mine workings. So who is your money on Chuck?

Do you think Winspear will try marketing diamonds out of
YK ? or will they ship all their booty out of country ?

Anybody's guess, however I suspect that the approval process will be similar or possibly more stringent than Ekati and Diavik and as such will ensure that a certain portion of the product is finished and marketed here in the north. There would be no need to set up their own facility as others already exist. Whether it is in YK or not is another question with a longer answer and many factors. I would suggest there is no way they would be allowed to get all of their "booty" out of the country nor would they necessarily want to. What do you think?

Is it still pretty good times in YK or is it slowing down ?

Yk experienced a real slowdown over the last few years as the diamond rush tapered off and settled down to serious exploration, the flavor of the month moved off to Voiseys Bay , then Indonesia, then BreX, then the price of gold slipping off. Without diamonds not only YK but the whole north would have been hurting. It has been slow in many sectors yet busy in few and recently there are signs of increased activity and some excitement showing through, what with Ekati in production over a year, Diavik now on stream with certainty, Snap in the wings and a strong resurgence of interest in the oil and gas industry with some totally awesome hits in the Liard area. Coupled with a new NWT government, land claims moving along, and many new opportunities cropping up, the future looks bright for the north and YK. There will be hitches of course, like new and cumbersome regulatory regimes, increased government involvement, power struggles between all levels of government etc. but then these are also industries all unto their own which helps the money spin even more. So I'd say more good times around the corner, and picking up as we post. What about yer neck of the woods?

Thanx
L8er
Regards,
Taz