SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (43317)4/25/2000 1:40:00 AM
From: Jacob Snyder  Respond to of 74651
 
Soooo.....

If Office is split off, the remaining company will still have both the OS and the browser. Which, I guess, they can combine if they want......until they get sued.....in 2005.....and it will all be finally resolved on the final appeal in 2009......by which time the Next Big Thing will have made both browsers and OS's obsolete.......



To: Jacob Snyder who wrote (43317)4/25/2000 2:15:00 AM
From: David Howe  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 74651
 
Thanks everyone for the feedback on my post. I was excessively frustrated today and felt the need to put my thoughts on paper. In regard to my off topic comment and this and other responses

<< Well, I was in total agreement with you until the last paragraph. A parent's right to custody of their child is not negotiable. >>

I agree with you that the child belonged with his father. My point was that the DOJ handled the situation poorly. That gun directly in his face was not necessary. IMO

Back to the DOJ / MSFT. It seems to me that any 'remedy' is in reality just a punitive measure at this point. Breaking up the company is so out of line it's mind boggling. As MSFT has said, this is out of left field. Nothing in the case is cause to take such drastic a measure.

This has simply become the case of a proud and misguided judge and a slew of MSFT's competitors that are in charge of formatting a verdict and resolution.

Dave