SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Dayuhan who wrote (17494)4/25/2000 2:11:00 AM
From: greenspirit  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 769667
 
Steven, I just thought it was an interesting article.

I do find it a little perplexing that you seem very concerned about the possible incorrect assumption one might take regarding statistics as they relate to correlation and causation here, but didn't seem to share any of those concerns the other day when discussing the teenage abortion and pregnancy statistics from the Netherlands.

I agree though, all statistics should be viewed with a skeptical eye. Especially, statistics related to sociological issues.

Michael



To: Dayuhan who wrote (17494)4/25/2000 5:54:00 PM
From: Gordon A. Langston  Respond to of 769667
 
I would like the
government to pass a law requiring all people who cite statistics and use the word "correlation" to disclaim their statements by
announcing that correlation is not causation, and should never ever be interpreted as being causation.


This might cause government itself to shrink to but a shadow of its' former self and bring a smile to the countenances of the founders. I like this one.

More play with correlation: we all know that there is a strong inverse correlation between education and religious activity. The
higher a person's educational attainment, the less likely that person is to be religious. Does that mean we should discourage
higher education?


The implication is they're not mutually compatible and perhaps we expect too much of either.<g>