SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Global Crossing - GX (formerly GBLX) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: MDGO who wrote (5849)4/25/2000 2:23:00 PM
From: Jeffrey James  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 15615
 
For those of us interested in international carriers and CLECs

Telecom stocks rally on Monday
Influential analyst Grubman issues defense of industry

By Jeffry Bartash, CBS MarketWatch
Last Update: 5:28 PM ET Apr 17, 2000 NewsWatch

WASHINGTON (CBS.MW) -- Telecommunications stocks struggled most of Monday to recover from last week's drubbing, but the sector came roaring back to life at the close of the trading session to end with a solid gain.

The American Stock Exchange's Networking index jumped 6.8 percent, led by Cisco Systems (CSCO: news, msgs), whose stock climbed 9 1/2 to 66 1/2. The Amex index is composed mostly of mature networking concerns such as Cisco and Lucent Technologies (LU: news, msgs).

Today on CBS MarketWatch
Nasdaq roars; Dow gains
Xerox show signs of life
International Paper in bid for Champion
Bell Atlantic, SBC profit rises
Exxon Mobil record profit
More top stories...
CBS MarketWatch Columns
Updated:
04/25/2000 11:16:46 AM ET

The Nasdaq's Telecommunications index, composed of younger growth companies whose soaring appreciations helped to propel the Nasdaq to a record high two months ago, averted a sixth straight decline. Though down most of the day, it closed up 6.2 percent. The index lost 27 percent of its value last week alone.

While many market gurus believe the high-tech companies driving the Nasdaq were wildly overvalued -- by traditional stock measure standards they were -- the telecom concerns are different from their brethren, namely the ".com" businesses.

Unlike many ".coms", most of the high-flying telecom companies have strong sales growth. A lesser but still large number also are making profits now or aren't that far away from doing so. And looking ahead, analysts see bulging sales for as far as the eye can see as carriers race to offer new, lucrative high-speed services and equipment makers hustle to build the gear to underpin the networks of the Internet Age.

For those and other reasons, Jack Grubman of Salomon Smith Barney -- considered by some the most powerful and perhaps smartest telecom analyst on Wall Street -- reiterated his "buy" ratings Monday on emerging independent local phone carriers and broadband suppliers.

"Despite current market conditions, we reiterate that secular trends in the telecom industry remains strong," Grubman said in a lengthy defense of the sector to investors. "Well-run companies in all categories should create a ton of value for shareholders and we would be taking advantage of current stock prices to buy the best names in each segment of the telecom industry."

Grubman, who also performs rare double duty as an investment banker to drum up business for his firm, argues that the Nasdaq's big case of indigestion last week doesn't alter the strong underlying growth prospects of the telecom industry.

Because of the large demand for their products and services, telecom concerns have been able to raise gobs of money and face little prospect of a cash crunch, a danger now threatening once-popular ".coms" such as Drkoop.com (KOOP: news, msgs). In addition, telecom companies are better managed than in the past and possess increasingly valuable assets that will eventually make them attractive candidates for takeover, Grubman said.

Among telecom carriers, Grubman likes the "clecs", or competitive local exchange carriers, which offer local and high-speed services in competition to the Baby Bells; and the high-speed national network operators such as Williams Communications (WCG: news, msgs), Level 3 Communications (LVLT: news, msgs) and Global Crossing (GBLX: news, msgs).

Those two sectors have suffered excessively in the latest market retreat, but they retain the highest growth prospects, he said.

At the same time, Grubman asserts that's it's OK to hold shares in some of the older carriers too. Like other industry observers, he believes a handful of global carriers will emerge, most likely from among today's giants. Only they appear to have the resources to rapidly snap up the assets they need to become all-purpose suppliers of telecommunications services.

"It is not mutually exclusive to own the high-quality new guys and to own the so-called 'old' guys who happen to be evolving into global providers of telecom services, especially the providers to large corporate users," he said in his report.

In short, Grubman seems to argue that overwhelming business and consumer appetite for bandwidth -- high-speed data and Internet connections -- will continue to drive demand and insulate the telecom sector.

While the logic of his argument is sound, investors should consider two things. The first, obviously enough, is that not all clecs or broadband suppliers are going to be winners. Picking exactly who they are is a big challenge. And the clear favorites, MacCleodUSA (MCLD: news, msgs), Allegiance Telecom (ALGX: news, msgs), Nextlink Communications (NXLK: news, msgs), remain highly valued relative to their peers, if not by traditional standards of measurement.

The second thing to consider is that already-intense competition is only going to build, eventually putting pressure on prices and hence profits of clecs and broadband suppliers. For now, though, that's not a concern.

In any event, the telecom sector remains a strong bet to play, perhaps the strongest bet in the whole stock market, particular as investors seek out more value and less hype. A new industry is being built, and these are companies laying the fibers or wireless infrastructure, installing the switches, tying together the high-speed networks and delivering the lucrative new services to customers.

* * *

Emerging independent multinational carriers such as Primus Telecommunications (PRTL: news, msgs), Viatel (VYTL: news, msgs) and Telscape International (TSCP: news, msgs) are among the favorites of Vik Grover, a communications analyst at Kaufman Brothers.

In the wake of the Nasdaq's retreat, those carriers are at historically low valuations, Grover said. Yet each has strong network assets, large customer bases, surging sales and experienced executives. All three are likely to be acquired, Grover said.

Primus, for its part, jumped 5 to 30 1/2. Yet Viatel lost 3 15/16 to 28 7/8, a 12 percent drop. Telscape slipped 7/8 to 11 1/4.




To: MDGO who wrote (5849)4/25/2000 5:37:00 PM
From: Teddy  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 15615
 
hi marv, (and thread)

RE: your post: Re-"discussions generated provides insight". Would be more meaningful if based on information regularly provided by GBLX. The lack thereof generates a lot of speculation ie. from wishful thinking at one extreme to hopelessness at the other end.

First, before i get to the reason of this post, let me remind you all that, even though i am the youngest poster on this thread, i have owned GBLX common stock since 3 days after the IPO (my first post was #20. there are a couple of us still here) and that my Dad is the Head Bean Counter for an S&P500 company.

OK, what i wanted to comment on was post about the lack of information regularly provided by GBLX.

There are certain rules (actually they are laws) that companies must follow relating to Press Releases and information provided to investors. Global Crossing LTD, like most companies, complies with those laws.

I have, several times on this thread, commented abouth the fact that investors need to ask the right person the right question on the right day to get an answer to half of the questions left unanswered... but that is not the majour driver at this time.

The issue at hand is "Quiet Time." This is a time when the SEC requires Management to put their head on their desk and pretend to take a nap.

1. "Quiet Time" comes from the end of a quarter until the results of that quarter are released (unless it is bad news, then Blood Sucking Class Action Monsters receive a reward before the people that took a risk).(for example: the Company can not comment on "someone" saying there will be no news from the Company for 5 months because they discovered a mountain [i think that guy covered this morning<G>])

2. "Quiet Time" has some limeted requirements after an acquizition is announce but before it is completed (for example: no one at Global crossing LTD can comment on why it is a good idea that they are buying that IXwhateva thingie).

3. "Quiet Time" also applies to statements made prior to secoundaries and other share offerings (you know, like a tracking stock). Let me just say this about Global Centre: Management has made comments about that event for atleast 8 months. Many of those comments were in public interviews or were other wise documented on this thread. There was nothing surprizing or out of the ordinary in yesterday's filing. If anyone is not happy with the terms, you can sell your shares at any time (of course anyone that is not happy with the terms is so lacking in understanding that they [in my opinion] should never have been allowed to but any stock in the first place).

4. "Quiet Time" there are some other rules, but i have done enough typing for one day.

Anyway, i forgot the reason for this post.
Results for the quarter will be announce early tomorrow, with a CC to be held at 9AM eastern time. Because of the IX and GC "Quiet Time," i would not expect to hear anything new.

Oh, marv, if the only contact you have at Global Crossing LTD is Jenny Chowderhead.... well dude, let's just say that it is not worth the time to type the question.



To: MDGO who wrote (5849)4/25/2000 6:35:00 PM
From: M. Charles Swope  Respond to of 15615
 
A proxy statement filed by GBLX with the SEC concerning the plan to issue additional shares and create a "tracking" stock can be found at:

siliconinvestor.com

Another proposal that will be voted on is to use some of the GlobalCenter shares (that's the tracking stock) in a management incentive plan (actually two separate plans). I'm something of a novice at reading these kinds of documents so I'd really benefit from hearing some informed comment about these incentive plans. I get nervous when I hear about management getting ready to reward themselves by handing out treasury stock and diluting the value of our shares.

I'm also nervous about the whole tracking stock concept which, from what I can tell, results in creating a corporation with two classes of stock. Having multiple classes of stock, though not uncommon, can lead to all sorts of chicanery.

I really appreciate the wisdom that is published on this thread. Things are happening! We need your analysis.

Charlie