Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : The Justa & Lars Honors Bob Brinker Investment Club -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: rsie who wrote (13450)	4/26/2000 1:20:00 AM
From: Nandu	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 15132

OK, I ignored the cut and paste of the Peggy Noonan article yesterday hoping that discussion of this issue will stop on this thread, but obviously not. So let me say this. The Peggy Noonan article is an absolute POS. The WSJ ought to be ashamed to have printed it. It took me a long time to come up with a plausible explanantion of why the WSJ would print such an obvious POS. And my conclusion is this. A political party that the WSJ is partial to is putting its foot in its mouth, being on the wrong side of this issue. The WSJ will print any cr*p to bail them out.