SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Scumbria who wrote (40775)4/25/2000 4:38:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 93625
 
Scumbria, <Servers are bandwidth limited, and apparently DDR provides all the bandwidth they need.>

>sigh<

It's not an issue of bandwidth; if it were, RDRAM may be the better choice than DDR for servers, considering how easy it is to gang up four RDRAM channels in parallel. Rather, it's other factors that make DDR more attractive for servers than RDRAM. I already went over some of those reasons earlier today.

Tenchusatsu



To: Scumbria who wrote (40775)4/25/2000 7:14:00 PM
From: jim kelley  Respond to of 93625
 
Has it occurred to you that servers are getting faster with each new generation of processor. Unfortunately, it looks like DDR is not going to get any faster. But its ok with me if AMD does not upgrade its servers(wait a minute they do not have any to speak of). <LOL>


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News