SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
SI - Site Forums : Questions and Answers with SI Admin (s) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: SI Bob who wrote (173)4/25/2000 6:31:00 PM
From: rrufff  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4893
 
Thanks Bob,

May I ask whether SI has been enforcing this and whether it is based on the assignment prohibition? In cyber land, an argument could be made that allowing someone to post under one's alias is the equivalent of an assignment.

Sincerely,

RR



To: SI Bob who wrote (173)4/27/2000 8:13:00 PM
From: re3  Respond to of 4893
 
BOB I'M turning myself in for a self imposed three day suspension
i swore at a feller named VENKIE today and thats why i'm turning myself in.
he was acting like an idiot on the clown thread today despite frequent requests to stop

si is nothing without its unpaid writers.

i won't write for si for three days now.

cheers from the mountain

ike godsey



To: SI Bob who wrote (173)4/27/2000 8:53:00 PM
From: Venkie  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4893
 
Bob
Plz don't suspend Ike..I am cool with his remark.
The mkt does funny things to us all.
I really don't want him suspended..plz
Donnie



To: SI Bob who wrote (173)4/29/2000 10:41:00 AM
From: MSB  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 4893
 
Hi Bob,

Is there some type of requirement which needs to be met (i.e. # of posts) before the current stock quote info is placed at the bottom of each post on a stock thread?

I'm formally requesting the quoting info for MGIC and SABA if one or both meet the criteria.

Mike



To: SI Bob who wrote (173)5/2/2000 3:48:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Respond to of 4893
 
I'll ask for a revision to forbid multiple people using a single account
I might suggest you not make this prohibition too broad. There are several husband/wife teams which post on threads at different times of the day and I would hate to lose their input.
TP