Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rambi who wrote (78912)	4/25/2000 8:07:00 PM
From: Ish	Respond to of 108807

<<You can see just how well-thought out MY opinions are!!!>> Dubyu thought it was a travisty and so do I. Dubyu really goes by rule of law.

To: Rambi who wrote (78912)	4/25/2000 8:53:00 PM
From: Ilaine	Respond to of 108807

Much confusion surrounding the matter, isn't there? I was just watching Bill Bennett on Hardball, he was opining that Juan Miguel's rights in the matter were somehow lesser because he thought Elian lived with his mother. When Chris Matthews corrected him, the dad had a much bigger house, he stayed most of the time with his dad (not to mention the fact that both worked, but Dad was remarried, and Mom worked longer hours) then Bennett kinda sputtered out. But the law doesn't say how old you have to be to apply for asylum, it says "any alien regardless of said alien's status" and age is a status. So that's why the case is proceeding, that's what the 11th circuit ruled on. Where did the age 12 thing come from, I am not following the thread, and it's not in anything I've seen. Definitely the way the case stands in the 11th Circuit, age doesn't matter. I've printed out the opinion. (Isn't it wonderful? We don't have to listen to people garble stuff anymore, we can go straight to the source. I've got the warrant, too.)