Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (78915)	4/25/2000 10:20:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 108807

I am a "where does this take us if we decide this way" kind of gal. And I do NOT like the precedents this would set. I do not think we want to encourage ANY foreign nationals to kidnap children and bring them here- and that is exactly what we would be doing if we support this. For me the broader foreign and social implications of a decision like this are of extreme importance. While parental rights are very important- they are secondary to the public policy- in this case both good public/foreign policy and parental rights happen to align. When I think about the vetching on this thread about parents rights! OY - On and on and on some people on this thread went (and on and on and on)- and yet those rights seem to be blithely forgotten. That is fascinating. But I suppose it is also predictable of issue driven politics that are not being generated by a comprehensive and rational framework.