Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : XYBR - Xybernaut -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Wolff who wrote (4069)	4/26/2000 12:47:00 PM
From: Scott C. Lemon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 6847

Hello Wolff, Good morning to you! Haven't the last couple of days been great! On top of that it's been beautiful weather here in Utah! > Lemon, you chose to be the self-admitted charlatan of > dishonest sophistry. I'm sorry, but again you seem to be a very confused person. You seem to have an obsession with lying when you state that I am a "self-admitted charlatan" ... I have expressed that I am no such thing ... but we all understand how you seem insistent in lies. > As I suspected you would not address straight factual > questions posed. I'm sorry, but I have reviewed the various posts, and I did not see any questions posed to me that I have not answered! ;-) I did notice that in your lack of understanding of even this message board, you have been posting to yourself lately ... I can only guess that even this message board is too confusing for you to operate. > Instead you chose to be the buffoon. I think we could take a vote here, and I'm afraid that you might lose. You sir, have made yourself appear as the only "buffoon" here ... > If you are able to put together a list of questions, that > like the one I put together, which is devoid of > personalities issues, without presuppositions of the > reader?s views, and sticking to straight facts or common > impressions?I would responds to that list, as I have > told you before. But wait ... you have been unable to write a post which is "devoid of personalities issues, without presuppositions of the reader?s views, and sticking to straight facts or common impressions" ... instead you have continued your blathering and insults. You have not yet answered a single question that I have posed to you. I'm sorry that again, in your confusion, you seem to think you are behaving as an adult. Again, a simple vote would probably not be in your favor. > I have not desire to be placed into a false dilemma and > have to explain why all the possibilities that are > offered are false. Yes ... we are all quite aware of the fact that you do not want to answer questions, or explain anything. You seem intent on simply posting false and misleading posts ... please continue to do so ... they are a very good indicator of your character and intentions. > I will not address questions like those offered before, > which look something like: "We all know <insert opinion> > and considering that you still feel <insert assumption>, > how can you explain <insert non factual statement>?" ... and that is your choice. I have a feeling that we know why you will not answer questions. In most cases they only prove your lack of understanding, and your intent on "bashing" rather than exploring the market and industry. This is well documented on the following web site: anatomyofbasher.netfirms.com > However, if you list out an honest straight question I > will do my best to respond. Ok ... I will post a list of questions to you, that are straight and specific questions. > If you are unable to both, respond to a list of straight > questions already offered, and generate a honest list of > questions, I believe that even you would agree, that you > would be a hypocrite. Nope ... we do not agree here. I know that you find this a convenient way to try and again justify your "interesting" perspective of the world, but I can not accept the terms of a proven hypocrite. I have numerous times offered to keep this to a strictly technical discussion, yet you have continued (even in this post) to take aggressive and insulting approaches to your bashing. If you can't see this, please re-read your first paragraph. Are you trying to tell everyone here that you have "good" intentions with this behavior? I can only say that your parents must be very proud of you. I will be more than glad to reply in a "professional" way, as soon as you decide to "grow up" do the same. > Its up to you now Lemon, can you be real? Since, in this post from you, you again decided to start off on a "nasty" foot, I will await your "professional" request to discuss this exciting technical area. It's actually up to you. Scott C. Lemon