SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Nortel Networks (NT) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (5535)4/26/2000 9:28:00 AM
From: Kenneth E. Phillipps  Respond to of 14638
 
NT indicated 113-116 per CNBC.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (5535)4/26/2000 10:00:00 AM
From: Bosco  Respond to of 14638
 
Hi Ken - not sure. I'd consider a good cyberfriend of mine, but I wouldn't recommend you to be NT CFO <VBG>! LEH guy is actually doing NT longs a big favor. I ve seen too many shareholders [not restricted to NT] who set their expectation too high. To reiterate my position, set conservative target and use conservative accounting method, then no one gets hurt. Of course, traders prefer the highs and lows. JMHO

best, Bosco



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (5535)4/26/2000 10:09:00 AM
From: Bill  Respond to of 14638
 
Warburg Dillon Reed raises price target to $150.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (5535)4/26/2000 10:47:00 AM
From: telecomguy  Respond to of 14638
 
Good that analysts continue to underestimate NT as Bosco mentioned. This means NT will have easier time beating estimates without playing "guideline" games.

If NT continues to surprise on the upside, at some point, NT will start to be taken more seriously right up there with CSCO and be assigned a premium for consistency on the upside.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (5535)4/27/2000 3:15:00 AM
From: David F.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 14638
 
ANALYSTS NEVER GET IT RIGHT, THEY ARE SCARED B*&*&^^%S
AND WEASELS,SNAKES YOU CALL IT.



To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (5535)4/28/2000 12:42:00 AM
From: jack bittner  Respond to of 14638
 
Ken, How do you figure?