Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : About that Cuban boy, Elian -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (2900)	4/26/2000 1:39:00 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

Well you thought wrong. It's not automatically the case. Maybe one good thing about this episode is we all will be a little more knowledgeable about US custody laws. I thought the law states that a child belongs with his surviving parent?

To: Rock_nj who wrote (2900)	4/26/2000 4:36:00 PM
From: Adelantado	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 9127

"I thought the law states that a child belongs with his surviving parent?" Don't let reason get into the way of the anticastro thought process. When a child is born in Cuba lands in the U.S. by surviving a selfish mother who risks the life of her 5 year old child to travel in an unsafe, open boat in shark infested waters to be with her boy friend in Florida then the law changes to: Custody should be given to the first member of the child's extended family or anyone at all able to get on TV with the loudest messge against the Cuban government and its political system dispite the fact that the child has an adequate father with a proven ability and desire to be the parent. The child-parent bond should not have any weight at all under these special circumstances, and any comment regarding the consequences of breaking the child-parent bond for political reasons should be quickly smothered or out screamed by loudspeakers and anticastro chants.