Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!! -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Neocon who wrote (78962)	4/26/2000 2:08:00 PM
From: epicure	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 108807

Certainly he is to be comfortable- and in general that means with the closest relative- now that his father is here, his father would be that person. The asylum guidelines mention children in fear for their physical safety at the hands of their parents- but that deals more with children sold or enslaved by their parents- this case is not analogous to those cases. The asylum request is supposed to come from the child without undue influence- there is no way a court won't find pressure was applied here.