SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : MDA - Market Direction Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: jbe who wrote (48270)4/26/2000 9:12:00 PM
From: Stcgg  Respond to of 99985
 
Stock Indexes.. Weighted Pessimism..

Very interesting, as it was somewhat of an anomaly to see the market fundamentals improving while the indices were declining.. The opposite of what had occured during the runup to March 10th..

Thanks!

>><<



To: jbe who wrote (48270)4/26/2000 9:16:00 PM
From: Wayners  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99985
 
Then the vast majority of stocks must have a Beta of less than 1.00, low volume, no investor interest and high floats. Who wants to own a bunch of REITS or utilities or preferred stocks?



To: jbe who wrote (48270)4/26/2000 9:21:00 PM
From: Michael Watkins  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 99985
 
Re comments on that article, I wonder about the "facts" quoted (i.e. 'the average stock only down 1%').

Not sure what those average stocks are. In my model and real portfolios the average stock is down 17% off its high; my short portfolio is up 24% in the space of mere weeks.

Looking at market internals, at the lowest low day the Nasdaq had over 600 new lows, thus the "average" stock is down far more than 1%. Since the begining of March, new highs have close to evaporated.

Volume accumulation across all stocks on the Nasdaq shows a dramatic sell off begining in earnest at the end of March.

The indexes may be weighted, but volume, new highs/lows, the Nasdaq advance/decline line -- they all tell stories.

The lesson is simple: If you are gauging the market...by using an index that is prejudiced toward a few large-cap technology stocks, chances are that you're reaching the wrong conclusion.

So in conclusion, I guess I don't agree with the author -- the lesson is not simple.



To: jbe who wrote (48270)4/26/2000 9:25:00 PM
From: bobby beara  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 99985
 
>>>What's all the fuss?<<<

i guess the author was not an investor in mlnm, omkt, neon, bvsn, rmbs or hundreds of other stocks that are 50-80% off their march highs.

b



To: jbe who wrote (48270)4/27/2000 1:37:00 AM
From: Berney  Respond to of 99985
 
jbe, I think Mr. Hulbert should stick to doing what he does best; whatever that is.

Prior to this little correction, as of the end of Feb, in the Morningstar universe of 6,957 stocks with a one year track record, 48.4% were negative. It probably has gotten a wee bit worse since then.

Berney