SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Victor Lazlo who wrote (102215)4/26/2000 10:43:00 PM
From: Jay Fisk  Respond to of 164684
 
Jungle logic: Amazon.com (AMZN:Nasdaq - news - boards) may have beaten revenue expectations and turned in a narrower-than-expected loss for the first quarter, but the real story to some investors is gross margins, one sign of how well run and potentially profitable a company really is. The fatter the margins, the better. And on the surface, Amazon's margins weighed in at an impressive 22.3%, up from 13% in the previous quarter. But dig deeper into the numbers and there are reasons to believe that the real gross margin is more like a paltry 1.2%.

The actual size of Amazon's real margins depends on two things. First is whether you include revenue from a series of recent marketing deals with upstart companies that aren't making any money. Short-sellers don't think you should, because those companies are not really part of Amazon. By not including those revenues, the gross margin would be more like 18.5%.

More important is whether you include fulfillment costs in the gross-margin calculation. Doing so would chop another 17 percentage points off margins, bringing the actual number down to around 1.2%. The reason this is so important is because like many e-commerce companies, Amazon currently expenses fulfillment costs (the cost of filling orders) as they occur and doesn't include them as part of the cost of sales, which determines a company's gross margin.

But, as Amazon itself warns, it may have to adjust its accounting and classification of fulfillment costs as a result of an ongoing debate in the accounting industry over whether fulfillment costs should be treated as a cost of doing business, and thereby included as a cost of sales.

Particularly disturbing this quarter is that fulfillment costs actually rose a percentage point from last quarter.

Bottom line, according to one skeptic: "They're selling books, DVDs, consumer electronics and everything else for barely above cost."

In which case, no matter what the company says, profitability is hardly around the corner.

------------------

Above exerpt from Herb Greenberg's "Heard on the Street" column at TSCM.