Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : The Critical Investing Workshop -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (16582)	4/27/2000 10:45:00 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Respond to of 35685

enough for now on MSFT we will revisit this by autumn next are damage awards in the $billions as long as MS continues its predatory practices, its subsidized leaps into adjacent areas, and its carefully hidden software linked advantages, MS will be targeted heavily, at least frozen your comments, Daisy, simply lack ANY substance Armstrong on CNBC now, what a joke scam boasted of wireless growth of 40% forgot to mention that wireless generally is growing at 60% forgot to mention they will NOT be participating one iota in the wireless internet CNBC is asking stupid questions now AWE will be a "barometer for wireless industry" ??????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? ??????????????????????????????????????????????????????? how about an update on the NYCity class action lawsuit from last August's widespread failure? / Jim

To: Cosmo Daisey who wrote (16582)	4/27/2000 2:22:00 PM
From: techguerrilla	Respond to of 35685

About DOJ attorneys and Microsoft After my many years as an attorney in the Antitrust Division, I came to a number of conclusions: 1) The new attorneys (generally young) hired by the Division were rather intelligent, but not brilliant. "Connections" were not the way in the door. I saw no genuinely weak young hirings. Two of my young attorney friends, in fact, were brilliant. One later taught antitrust at Boston University. The other eventually helped start up Oracle's legal department. He now runs it. Man I wish I had his money. What a great guy. 2) The attorneys who stayed with the Division for a protracted period of time were dull and not particularly intelligent. Basically clock-punching bureaucrats. Generally, the dopes couldn't find other jobs and were protected by the Civil Service Commission. They were quite eccentric. At times I thought they were mentally ill. These were impressions I gleaned from my years with the Chicago Field Office of the United States Department of Justice, Antitrust Division. The Washington office had a somewhat similar overview with the major exception of the major case section. The true wizards seemed to find their way to that section. I saw colleagues with phenomenal minds gravitate to that section. They took on IBM and AT&T with the unlimited power of the federal government. They were true believers in antitrust enforcement. What happened in those cases in the end? Regarding Microsoft. Case closed. They have been backed into a corner by some of the finest antitrust experts in the nation, as well as by their incredible arrogance and illegal behavior. The government will not back down and has obtained factual rulings from the lower court. Microsoft will be estopped on most of those factual findings. Porching and enjoying QCOM's comeback from ashes, John