SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : George Gilder - Forbes ASAP -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Mike Ankley who wrote (3668)4/27/2000 12:26:00 PM
From: George Gilder  Read Replies (5) | Respond to of 5853
 
No it is not a coincidence. It is a result of Gilder Gagnon and Howe's close allegiance to my paradigm. I discussed Avanex in earlier GTRs. I visited Gilder Gagnon during a New York trip about two months ago; I probably mentioned Avanex then, though my current enthusiasm developed over the subsequent months. I have no money invested with Gilder, or any family connection whatsoever. But David Howe has come to all our telecosm conferences and Richard Gilder is an ally on supply side economics. He also shares my father's name and my son's name. Life is like that. A sociologist expounded the theory of six degrees of separation: six links can interconnect any two people on earth. I have several links with Gilder Gagnon but absolutely no financial connection to this excellent company.

--GG



To: Mike Ankley who wrote (3668)4/27/2000 1:04:00 PM
From: GOPbabe  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
Had A&Pers done research on GG, you would have known
GILDER, GAGNON, HOWE & CO. is no way related to this George Gilder. For some reason there is always an assumption that George is related to every Gilder in the phone book. However, imho, when people have set out to smear someone or impugn another individual's reputation, they cannot afford to "assume" anything but had better have their facts straight.

Now that GG has responded to your insider holding question on AVNX, to persist in a smear campaign on this issue does not to enhance your credibility or intent of purpose.

It is now Anthony and his followers turn to answer some questions. I want to know how many companies your group has targeted and and how many of these companies were wrongly accused of wrongdoing by Anthony/Pluvia/ . This is a simple question of which I would like a number and the names of these companies.

Naturally we expect as timely a response as GG gave you, and we expect you to be equally as forthcoming.

Merylee



To: Mike Ankley who wrote (3668)4/27/2000 2:21:00 PM
From: TigerPaw  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 5853
 
Mighty strong coincidence???
A statistical sample of one event has no signifigance. Are you aledging a pattern here? If so what is the pattern? It sounds to me like you lost a high risk gamble and are trying to blame everyone but the man in the mirror.
TP