Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : All About Sun Microsystems -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tiquer who wrote (31411)	4/28/2000 6:48:00 PM
From: Gerald Walls	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 64865

Robert wrote.."If you don't use M$FT I won't use $un, OK? It's childish and contributes nothing to the debate." You describe your own thought as one which would be childish... Cheryl just agreed with you... Cheryl wrote"You can use the nomenclature of your choice. We can both be childish at the same time." I'm not Robert, but that's not important. She agreed that the use of either M$FT or $un is childish. She then continued the use of M$FT, acting childishly. The only reason to do this is to poison the debate. I apologize for the "jack@$$" part. That part was uncalled for. Get a life dude.. If you can't debate a subject with out resorting to name calling... GET LOST! I agree that people have the right to act childishly. I just don't have time for them. The debate was already over because I dropped out. (Anyone who wants to believe that means I'm conceding the point may now do their victory dance. I won't mind.) I was responding to a third party as to the reason why I don't want to GET LOST (as you say) and leave the thread to those who believe McNealy to be God and Gates to be Satan. I respect that you're not one of the Sun Gloaters who post with glee over on the MSFT thread and constantly ask about renaming the thread "How low can MSFT go?". Why don't they GET LOST?