Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Global Platinum & Gold (GPGI) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (13068)	4/28/2000 6:08:00 PM
From: SnakeInATuxedo	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

They don't care any more, Chuca; all they want to do now is put out a bufu and bafflegab PR every 6 months celebrating the peeling of another layer of the onion in the hopes of find a new batch of su.. , I mean investors.

To: Chuca Marsh who wrote (13068)	4/28/2000 8:50:00 PM
From: Zeev Hed	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 14226

Chuca, sorry for the delay. Yes I can conceive a process where platinum would be used as inquarts to nucleate the precipitation process of platinum if it was in solution. This either a water based solution or a glass based solution. In both cases, I do not see how the same inquarts could be used twice, unless the precipitates themselves are used (as inquarts) in the subsequent process. In the latter case, this should have been a self perpetuating process and only one set of "inquarts" would be used. In the former case, you could not use it twice. Thus that news release , as stingy as it is on facts, has sufficient contradictory facts in it not to pay much attention to it, all, in my very humble opinion and based on general principles of the theory of nucleation of solid phases from solutions. I would not go so far as to call the writer of this release a "liar", but surly someone who is not close to the process (if a "process" indeed exists) and does not understand what is going on. Zeev